Home Visitors Sermons Essays Search Links Members Feedback

Pastor Andrew J. Webb
WHAT WE BELIEVE: We are a Reformed, Evangelical,
Presbyterian Congregation. We gratefully receive the Westminster Confession
and Larger and Shorter Catechisms and
believe them to be an accurate summary of the doctrine taught in
scripture.
|
The Good Samaritan
Andrew james Webb
Luke 10:25-37:
25 And behold, a certain lawyer stood up and tested
Him, saying, "Teacher, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?" 26 He
said to him, "What is written in the law? What is your reading of it?" 27
So he answered and said, " 'You shall love the LORD your God with all your
heart, with all your soul, with all your strength, and with all your
mind,' and 'your neighbor as yourself.' " 28 And He said to him, "You have
answered rightly; do this and you will live." 29 But he, wanting to
justify himself, said to Jesus, "And who is my neighbor?" 30 Then Jesus
answered and said: "A certain man went down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and
fell among thieves, who stripped him of his clothing, wounded him, and
departed, leaving him half dead. 31 "Now by chance a certain priest came
down that road. And when he saw him, he passed by on the other side. 32
"Likewise a Levite, when he arrived at the place, came and looked, and
passed by on the other side. 33 "But a certain Samaritan, as he journeyed,
came where he was. And when he saw him, he had compassion. 34 "So he went
to him and bandaged his wounds, pouring on oil and wine; and he set him on
his own animal, brought him to an inn, and took care of him. 35 "On the
next day, when he departed, he took out two denarii, gave them to the
innkeeper, and said to him, 'Take care of him; and whatever more you
spend, when I come again, I will repay you.' 36 "So which of these three
do you think was neighbor to him who fell among the thieves?" 37 And he
said, "He who showed mercy on him." Then Jesus said to him, "Go and do
likewise."
Although this parable only occurs in the Gospel according to Luke, it is
probably one of the most well-known of all the stories in the Bible. Most
people are so generally familiar with it, that you can use the phrase
"Good Samaritan" in a conversation with unbelievers and they'll probably
know what you are referring to even if they have no idea what a Samaritan
was (and no the Samaritans of the first century the time when Jesus told
this parable were not RV owners or people who generally went about doing
good deeds).
But what I want to suggest today is that while this story is well-known,
just like the story of David and Goliath, it is possible to be familiar
with the details of the story, and yet badly misunderstand what it is God
is really telling us. So what I am going to ask you to do today is to look
at this familiar story with new eyes. For the moment, forget that you know
all about this story and what the messages is, and let's read it anew
together. I suspect if you are really willing to do that, you might be
surprised at the results.
First, lets look at the context in which Jesus tells this parable, this
earthly story with a heavenly meaning.
Jesus is the process of teaching when a lawyer stands up and asks him a
question. A lawyer was not a person who sued people or represented people
in court, but an expert in the Law of God. This is a man who had spent his
life studying the teaching of the first 5 books of the bible, the
Pentatuch, or the books of the law as they were called and the way in
which they were interpreted by the Rabbis.
The question this lawyer asks Jesus is a good one, in fact its the most
important question that anyone can ask. "What shall I do to inherit
eternal life?" He assumes that the mere 80 or so years that we are here on
earth for are not the end, that there is an afterlife. Because he is a
religious Jew we can assume that he knew that there is a God and that
there is also Heaven and Hell and that after they die it is possible for
men to end up in one or the other. He is asking therefore "How can I be
assured that my inheritance after this life will be heaven and not hell?"
I hope all of you have asked that question as well and already know the
correct answer the biblical answer.
Now not only is this Lawyer asking the right question, he's also asking
the right person. He's asking Jesus. Jesus was pretty much the same
question by another Pharisee, a man by the name of Nicodemus, and he asked
Jesus because he believed he was a "teacher come from God." (John 3:2)
But you have been told that while this Lawyer was asking the right
question of the right person, he was asking for the wrong reason.
Did anyone ever ask you a question because they didn't think you knew the
right answer? Well this Lawyer was asking Jesus testing or tempting him
because he wanted to show him up. He's asking expecting an answer that
would somehow contradict the Law of Moses so he can show Him up:
We will see this happening more and more explicitly as we continue on in
the book of Luke. In fact in the very next chapter we read:
Luke 11:53 And as He said these things to them, the scribes and the
Pharisees began to assail Him vehemently, and to cross-examine Him about
many things, 54 lying in wait for Him, and seeking to catch Him in
something He might say, that they might accuse Him.
The Pharisees generally did not believe Jesus was the Son of God, the
Messiah, and most didn't even think he was a teacher come from God, as
Nicodemus did. And it is because of that that Jesus doesn't answer this
Lawyer the way He answered Nicodemus. To Nicodemus he said "For God so
loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes
in Him should not perish but have everlasting life."
But what do you think would have happened had He told this unbelieving
Lawyer that the key to eternal life was believing in Jesus? This Lawyer
not only thinks Jesus is a shyster, he believes that the key to salvation
lies in keeping the LAW.
So Jesus asks him "What does the Law say must be done in order for a man
to not only be able to stand before God blameless and uncondemned but to
MERIT or have earned eternal life?"
In answering that question in verse 27 the Lawyer gives a great answer, he
gives the same summary of the Law that Jesus Himself gives in Matthew 22.
That shouldn't surprise us because that answer comes straight from the
Word of God:
Deut. 6:5 "You shall love the LORD your God with all your heart, with all
your soul, and with all your strength.
Lev. 19:18 'You shall not take vengeance, nor bear any grudge against the
children of your people, but you shall love your neighbor as yourself: I
am the LORD.
There you have a perfect summary of the two tables of the MORAL LAW, the
TEN COMMANDMENTS, the first 4 consisting of our duties to God and the
second 6 concerning our duties to man.
Probably to the Lawyers shock Jesus AGREES with Him! Yes if you can do
that you will inherit eternal life!
Now that should have caused him to despair! How many of you believe that
you have consistently:
Loved the LORD your God with all your heart, with all your soul, with all
your strength, and with all your mind,' and 'your neighbor as yourself?
Anyone?
His answer should have been at that point, "WOE IS ME! For I have fallen
so far short of that standard!" And yet instead he is still trying to trip
Jesus up. Ok, I honestly believe that I can love my neighbor as myself,
because my neighbors are members of the sect of the Pharisees and I'm a
Pharisee. I can still get him, I can show that I am justified, that we
Pharisees whom this uneducated Galilean has been dissing have fulfilled
the requirements of the Law.
So he asks Who is my neighbor? Whom do I have to love as much as I love
myself?
Jesus answers with the story of the Good Samaritan. He tells us about a
man, the audience would have naturally assumed correctly that he means a
Jew, who took the difficult and dangerous road from Jerusalem to Jericho.
Please put your thumbs in Luke 10 and turn to the maps in the back of your
bibles if they have them]
You'll see that Jerusalem is in the Mountains, but Jericho is way down
here in the Jordan valley. The distance is only about 17 miles but you end
up descending about 3000 feet. The area is very hilly with lots of caves
and ravines, which were good for hiding in. It's perfect bandit country,
and apparently one of those bands of robbers attacked this man, beat him
within an inch of his life, took whatever mount he had and stripped him of
everything, even his clothes and left him for dead.
The first man who comes along and sees him lying by the road is a Priest.
Now, you may have heard explanations for why the priest chooses not to
stop for him. Some have speculated that the priest didn't know if the man
was dead and did not want to become ceremonially unclean by accidentally
touching a corpse. But the priest is coming down from Jerusalem and so he
has probably finished his stint serving in the temple. Besides the Law and
the prophets make it quite clear that mercy is a more important duty even
than serving in the temple: Micah 6:8 He has shown you, O man, what is
good; And what does the LORD require of you But to do justly, To love
mercy, And to walk humbly with your God?
Keep in mind that that priest was probably just as conversant with Lev.
19:18 and the command to love your neighbor as yourself as the Pharisee.
Why didn't he keep that command? Maybe because he too didn't see him as
his neighbor, probably because he didn't want to get involved, and
probably also because he was just plain scared and afraid to stop.
During the Second World War, it was very common for the crews of torpedoed
ships to end up drowning or dying of hypothermia even though they were
within easy rescuing distance of other ships in the convoy. Those ships
didn't stop for the men in the water because by doing so, they would have
become sitting ducks for any U-Boats still in the area. They pragmatically
assessed the situation and decided it wasn't worth the risk. Only the
bravest or most merciful of captains did stop, and often they paid for it
with their own lives.
We don't know for certain but the Priest and the Levite who passed by, may
have been thinking something similar. Those bandits might still be around.
If I stop for this man who may already be dead, I'll be easy pickings
myself.
Consider this, imagine that you made a wrong turn and ended up in the
worst possible part of the inner city you've ever seen. Imagine you are
driving home late at night having cashed your paycheck when you spot what
might be a beaten up guy, with hardly a shred of clothing, laying on the
sidewalk. Is your first instinct to stop the car and leap out to find out
if he's ok? Stopping involves a significant risk doesn't it? It's not just
an "inconvenience." It might even involve a sacrifice.
The second man to come by is a Levite, a man who helped in the temple. He
presumably would also know that He is commanded by God to show mercy and
help this man, and yet he does not. He too, chooses not to get involved.
Now those listening would be thinking, will anyone help this poor man?
Finally a third man comes along. Can you imagine the shock of the audience
when they hear who it is? It's like you've told them the wagon train is
surrounded by angry Commanches, they're down to their last bullets. When
suddenly there is a cloud of dust on the horizon, is it the cavalry. NO!
Its the APACHES!
When you think Samaritans and Jews in the Bible, think Serbs and Kosavars,
Hutus and Tutsis, Koreans and Japanese, Israelis and Palestinians. These
guys, hate each other. The audience at this point probably thinks well
he's just gone from the frying pan to the fire. This Samaritan will
probably cross over to his side of the road in order to ride his donkey
over him.
And then the real shocker comes, it is this Samaritan who stops,
dismounts, and takes care of the man, binding his wounds, loading him on
his own donkey and walking beside the man till he reaches an Inn. Then
when he gets there, he pays the innkeep to see to him till he recovers
giving him enough for at least 2 weeks of room and board & telling him to
charge him for whatever else it costs.
Now would anyone really do that for the enemy of his people?
Fredericksburg - Richard Kirkland, Sergeant with the 2nd South Carolina,
was stationed on the other side of the stone wall during the Federal
assaults. On December 14, he asked his superiors if he could bring water
to the suffering Federals, wounded on the other side of the wall. He was
given permission, but they would not let him use a white flag for fear
that it would suggest that the Confederates were surrendering. He filled
canteens and, with great risk to himself, went over the wall.
Union pickets aimed at him, thinking he was a scavenger, but they lowered
their weapons when he went to the first man -- a wounded Union soldier --
and gave the man water. He went from wounded to wounded, Union and
Confederate alike, and made the man more comfortable. He gave them water,
straightened broken limbs, bound wounds. Gradually his mission dawned on
everyone and he was left to do what he could for the wounded. He returned
to the wall after more than an hour and a half of ministering to the
suffering on both sides.
All that for men who were invading his "country" and who had just finished
sacking the town of Fredericksburg! He could easily have been killed as
soon as he popped his head over that wall!
This is what it means to Love your Neighbor as yourself.
Luke 6:27 " But I say to you who hear: Love your enemies, do good to those
who hate you, 28 "bless those who curse you, and pray for those who
spitefully use you. 29 "To him who strikes you on the one cheek, offer the
other also. And from him who takes away your cloak, do not withhold your
tunic either.
We must show mercy to all in need, not just our loved ones, our
countrymen, but even our enemies.
Two Applications:
1) Why must we do this? NOT because we are hoping for a reward, and
certainly not because as some have taught it will suddenly cause all men
to love one another. After Richard Kirkland hopped over that wall, the two
armies did not see their shared brotherhood and join hands and start
singing Kumbaya. The Confederates did not suddenly see in this act of
mercy that their keeping of slaves was wrong and go home and free them,
the Federals did not see the wrong of attempting to bring all men under
the control of one central government. In fact "The Angel of Marye's
Heights" as Richard Kirkland came to be known, was killed two years later
at Chickamauga. Keep in mind that the bullet or shell that killed him
might even have been fired by the brother of one of the men he tended to,
or even that man himself.
We do it because it is God's command and according Christ's example, and
thus it is the right thing for us to do regardless of the circumstances.
And I do mean regardless, even if you knew that one of the men you were
helping would someday kill you, you should still do it! Its not about
them, its about the gospel and mercy is central to the Gospel!
"Hardheartedness to others in misery reproaches the gospel. When men's
hearts are like pieces of rock, or as the scales of the leviathan, "shut
up as with a close seal," you may as well extract oil out of flint, as the
golden oil of charity out of them. Job 41:15. They unchristianize
themselves. Unmercifullness is the sin of the heathen. "Unmerciful." Rom.
1:31. It eclipses the glory of the gospel. Does the gospel teach
uncharitableness? Does it not bid us "draw out thy soul to the hungry"?
Isaiah 58:10. "These things I will that thou affirm, that they which have
believed in God, might be careful to maintain good works." Titus 3:8.
While you relieve not such as are in want, you walk in opposition to the
gospel; you cause it to be evil spoken of, and lay it open to the lash and
censure of others." Thomas Watson
2) You should realize what the Pharisee did not, how far short of Loving
God and Neighbor we actually come, how often we hate our enemies and
desire to see harm come to them. How often we render evil for evil. You
should flee therefore to the only one who truly LOVED his enemies, and
even died for them: But God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that
while we were still sinners, Christ died for us. (Romans 5:8)
Jesus did for us His Enemies what the Samaritan did, only for him the
cost was far greater and our need was far more dire.
And thus we live in his example, not as though we were able to obtain
salvation by our own deeds, but BECAUSE Christ has already obtained it for
us. Even if we were to lose our lives in the process, we would remain MORE
THAN CONQUERORS because of what Jesus has won for us!
|